Search for: "Stewart v. People"
Results 481 - 500
of 697
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 8:27 am
Most notably, the Comstock Act did not specifically define what qualified as obscene printed material– a question that the court would struggle with through the 1960’s, when Justice Potter Stewart would write his infamous “I know it when I see it” observation in Jacobellis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 4:57 am
Stewart, Opposition No. 91162024 (March 13, 2007) [not precedential] and New York State Dept. of Economic Development v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 92-93 (1966) (Stewart, J., concurring)). [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 1:55 am
Sky Bet has been reprimanded by the ICO for unlawfully processing people’s data using advertising cookies without their consent. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:28 pm
As Michael previewed this morning, the Supreme Court heard argument today in Helsinn v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Stewart Woodman and Majoy were tried together. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 11:28 am
Facebook Entry and Blog Post May Support Retaliation Claim – Stewart v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm
Stewart, who is mostly siding with the broadcasters. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Hanover Star v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 92–93 (1966) (Stewart, J., concurring)). 7. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
Calcutt v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 6:00 pm
Coker v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:44 am
Peoples Bank of Lakewood Village, 333 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
