Search for: "Stewart v. Washington" Results 1 - 20 of 473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Shortly after taking office, he had an opportunity to do that, with Justice Potter Stewart’s announcement in June 1981 that he would retire in early July. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” That leaves any potential censorship based on the ridiculous standard which Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart advanced for pornography in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:14 pm by Josh Blackman
And for those counting at home, the moderates Justices Stewart (Eisenhower) and Stevens (Ford) were in the majority. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
District Judge Amit Mehta of Washington, D.C., raise difficult questions with no close precedents. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:03 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Elena Kagan gave a rousing and funny tribute focused on Stewart’s passion for the Washington Capitals hockey team. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 IP at the Supreme Court Series: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 11:57 am by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
District Court judge authorizing the use of a geofence warrant in the Jan. 6 prosecution case United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:34 pm by Stewart Baker
Finally, we make quick work of a few more stories: This week's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by Roger Parloff
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]