Search for: "Still v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co."
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
Plaintiffs’ expert witnesses still opine that each and every exposure was substantial, without any basis in evidence, and they still recite the same 5x, 10x, and 50x risk ratios, based upon Selikoff’s insulator studies, even though the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas probably has not seen more than a handful of insulators’ cases in the last decade. [read post]