Search for: "Still v. Social Security Administration Commissioner"
Results 61 - 80
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can require companies to disclose information about their climate, environmental, social, and governance risks and practices. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 8:51 am
The July 2020 decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
On Feb. 11, after Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas was confirmed, DHS announced that it would begin Phase 1 of a program to restore processing for those individuals already enrolled. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
Vice President Kamala Harris lived in Montreal for her high school years of 1976 to 1981, when Quebec separatism and language and ethnic rights were still of a very highly energized, national political priority—and they remain much the same. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
In her dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote that “for the first time, the Court casts totally aside countervailing rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 11:34 am
These data localization obligations raise significant concerns about user privacy, free speech, and information security. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 8:38 am
The secretary of Health and Human Services has long delegated authority to make the second determination to the FDA commissioner. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm
The court heard that six of the offending websites subject to a previous order were still available. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
Koppelman accuses me of being too forgiving of the civil rights commissioner in Masterpiece and of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
” Helvering focused on Title II of the Social Security Act, which authorized grants of money for “Old Age Benefits” in order to assist states in the administration of their unemployment compensation laws. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
The Panopticon blog had a post on the CJEU announcing that judgment will be handed down in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland & Schrems on 16 July 2020. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
