Search for: "Still v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 49,738
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 1:25 pm
The lawsuit (State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:07 pm
The difference between the two definitions was addressed in the recent case of State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:05 am
McDaniel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
Under the doctrine, named after the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:10 am
In State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Subscribers would still see ads under the proposal which would be the first major product of Google’s to be put behind a paywall. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 8:12 am
As amazing as this technology is, it is still a medical procedure that involves the risk of negligence. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
From Wednesday's opinion in H.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
Iancu v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 6:49 am
The case is entitled Ash v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Mississippi’s Jim Crow Laws Still Haunt Black Voters Today (Marshall Project). [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:09 pm
The Minnesota Court of Appeals decided that these types of warrants do not violate the United States and Minnesota constitutions per se, and further found that the warrant at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 3:41 pm
And Carson v. [read post]
