Search for: "Stock v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 5,479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
As stock prices reflect profits potentially years in the future, even long-term climate-related risks can affect profit [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:43 pm
Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 10:00 am
Everson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
But like Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 7:56 am
V. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from Ruth V. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 11:33 am
State-licensed insurance producers with an operating presence at a physical office within the United States, and authorized by a State, and subject to supervision by a State’s insurance commissioner or a similar official or agency. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 10:29 am
In Ganpat v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
I'm the primary presenter on three topics: the overruling of Chevron deference in the Loper Bright case (plus a comment on the Corner Post case); the Second Amendment ruling in Rahimi and the statutory ruling on bump stocks in Garland v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 10:08 am
Quintana v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
Chung v Notting Hill Genesis This is a case that exemplifies the Court’s power to extend time limits. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:11 am
It is time now to take stock of what the ICJ has told the world, and the ensuing legal obligations. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 4:36 pm
"Trotter v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In Garland v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In a 6-3 decision in Garland v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Choi at University of Michigan Law School, and Geeyoung Min at Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In NFIB v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:00 am
David V. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm
ATF, the Sixth Circuit resorted to the rule of lenity instead of Chevron deference to resolve an ambiguity in favor of the private citizen by deciding that a semi-automatic gun equipped with a bump stock is not a machine gun—the same ruling the Supreme Court recently reached in Garland v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:33 pm
The unanimous three-judge panel reasoned that the exclusion of 18 to 20-year-olds from handgun possession was not “consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation,” following the requirements of the US Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]