Search for: "Stock v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 6,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) promulgated a rule stating that bump stocks were machine guns for purposes of the National Firearms Act (NFA) and the federal prohibition on the possession or sale of machine guns. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 8:00 am
  As a result, the court stated that the directors did not act with scienter because they did not knowingly backdate the stock option grants. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:45 pm by Ettinger Law Firm
In the recent case, Heiting v. the United States, an appellate court denied a claim-of-right deduction in accordance with Section 1341 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:35 pm by Andrew Hamm
“Bump stocks,” “machineguns,” and Chevron deference In Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Peter Mahler
West Virginia: Court Sustains Jury’s Valuation Award Excluding Marketability and Minority Discounts Under Stock Redemption Agreement’s Fair Market Value Standard Tri-State Petroleum Corp. v Coyne, 814 S.E.2d 205 [Sup. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:21 pm
Early this year the Delaware Chancery Court, in two opinions,, In re Tyson Foods and Ryan v Gifford, allowed shareholder derivative suits to proceed that were based on dating compensatory stock options. [read post]
13 May 2013, 10:53 am by Greg Daugherty
Many commentators were surprised by the recent federal court of claims decision to deny summary judgment in Sutardja v United States. [read post]