Search for: "Stock v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 5,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm by Old Fox
linkSomerset, Red was assigned to Republican states in the annual election night maps used by the TV networks. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 3:32 am
Officer Exposure for Stock Option Backdating Travis Laster notes: On November 21st, Chancellor Chandler of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a further decision in Ryan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 8:46 am
Commissioner of Revenue Services (Tax appeal; assessment of taxes with respect to certain stock options and restricted stock units granted by employer as compensation for services performed both in this state and in New York) [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:24 pm by Alison Rowe
In a rare appellate opinion dealing with a Texas stock law, the Waco Court of Appeals recently found in favor of Bradley Evans, an “alleged” cow owner in the case of Evans v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:21 am by Peter Mahler
Nebraska Supreme Court Overturns Application of Discounts In Fair-Value Buyout Bohac v Benes Service Co., 310 Neb. 722 [Neb. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
The court interpreted this provision of the Articles Supplementary to establish a limitation upon the right of preferred stockholders to convert their stock, distinguishing the preferred stock at issue from convertible preferred securities. (3) The court declined to speculate about the possible ramification of Section 7(b) of the Articles Supplementary, related to voting rights, which had not been expressly argued.For Count II, the court held that the plaintiff had failed to… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Tom Crane
  Our state difffers from many states which simply require compensation or money to make a non-compete agreement binding. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:34 am
Yesterday the Appellate Division, First Department reversed a lower court ruling and dismissed a breach of fiduciary duty claim against the New York Stock Exchange and its Chief Executive Officer John Thain - Hyman v New York Stock Exch., Inc., 2007 NY Slip Op 09909. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:34 am
This means the plan document states one of the purposes of the plan is to hold employer stock. [read post]