Search for: "Stock v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 6,118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued another decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:56 pm
United States, 406 U.S. 128, 155 (1972). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:24 pm
In a rare appellate opinion dealing with a Texas stock law, the Waco Court of Appeals recently found in favor of Bradley Evans, an “alleged” cow owner in the case of Evans v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 8:46 am
Commissioner of Revenue Services (Tax appeal; assessment of taxes with respect to certain stock options and restricted stock units granted by employer as compensation for services performed both in this state and in New York) [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:00 am
United States placed non-publicly traded stock within a revocable trust. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Coster v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 1:01 am
The case is CSARS V Atlas Capco South Africa (Pty) Ltd. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:21 am
Nebraska Supreme Court Overturns Application of Discounts In Fair-Value Buyout Bohac v Benes Service Co., 310 Neb. 722 [Neb. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 11:41 am
Alsenz v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
Weissman v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Janus v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 1:44 am
Desimone v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 11:50 am
OneScreen, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:24 am
Our state difffers from many states which simply require compensation or money to make a non-compete agreement binding. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” She noted that, as in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
The court interpreted this provision of the Articles Supplementary to establish a limitation upon the right of preferred stockholders to convert their stock, distinguishing the preferred stock at issue from convertible preferred securities. (3) The court declined to speculate about the possible ramification of Section 7(b) of the Articles Supplementary, related to voting rights, which had not been expressly argued.For Count II, the court held that the plaintiff had failed to… [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:34 am
Yesterday the Appellate Division, First Department reversed a lower court ruling and dismissed a breach of fiduciary duty claim against the New York Stock Exchange and its Chief Executive Officer John Thain - Hyman v New York Stock Exch., Inc., 2007 NY Slip Op 09909. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 4:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:34 am
This means the plan document states one of the purposes of the plan is to hold employer stock. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 11:04 am
Leiza Dolghih Attorney, Godwin Lewis PC The Texas Supreme Court in ExxonMobil Corp. v. [read post]
