Search for: "Stock v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 6,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 11:34 am
This means the plan document states one of the purposes of the plan is to hold employer stock. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:32 am by Eric
Other New York state court rulings that have interpreted 47 USC 230 broadly include Shiamili v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:36 am by Steve Bainbridge
Secrist also stated that various regulatory agencies had failed to act on similar charges made by Equity Funding employees. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
In early 2016, Mazzal’s CEO entered into a stock purchase agreement (SPA) in which he agreed to sell 45.8 million restricted shares of Mazzal to B2. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 8:41 am by Zamansky
On November 6, 2019, Zamansky LLC partner Sam Bonderoff represented the participants in the employee stock-ownership plan (“ESOP”) for IBM, and argued the case of Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 11:24 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
A company that provided administrative and payroll services was acquired by a bank under a stock purchase agreement. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
Berger Held: When stating a claim for breach of fiduciary duty by the board of directors in a stock-for-stock merger, the duty of profit maximization under Shenker v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:37 am by Joy Waltemath
First, where a stock is publicly traded, allegations that a fiduciary should have recognized on the basis of publicly available information that the market was overvaluing or undervaluing the stock are generally implausible and thus insufficient to state a claim under Iqbal and Twombly. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:22 pm
The trial judge entered judgment in favor of the employee in the amount of almost $850,000, stating that the employer granted the stock options for goals already achieved by the employee (even though the options had not vested).Analysis: The Court of Appeals reversed. [read post]