Search for: "Stocker v. Wells"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
The point is well summarised in Ms Stocker’s Grounds of Appeal [pdf], at paragraph 7: The determination of meaning is often determinative of the outcome of the claim. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
The point is well summarised in Ms Stocker’s Grounds of Appeal [pdf], at paragraph 7: The determination of meaning is often determinative of the outcome of the claim. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Moreover, a supervisor’s alleged statement that that “[s]he could do more when she was younger than she can now” was a stray remark and not tied to his firing (Dominick v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., March 16, 2015, Teilborg, J.). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:22 am
The case is entitled Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:37 am
The plaintiff applied to be a stocker in Lowe’s Honolulu store. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
A good example of this is Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17; [2018] EWCA Civ 170; [2016] EWHC 474 (QB) in which the meaning of five words “he tried to strangle me” went all the way on appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 pm
In the well known case of Stocker v Stocker, although the case failed on meaning it was accepted that publication had been proved on the basis that the message was visible to the 110 Facebook friends of the person to whom it was addressed. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
However, if such an offer is not accepted then the sensible course of action will normally be to make a well-pitched Part 36 Offer. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 12:47 pm
The case is Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
The court reiterated the principles as set out in Jeynes v News Magazine Ltd [2008] EWCA, Civ. 130, as affirmed in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
Wells v Devani, heard 11 Oct 2018. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:51 pm
By Eric Goldman Stebbins v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Howard, supra.The court then explained that its “standard of review for admissibility of evidence is well-established”, e.g. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:08 am
Prillman v. [read post]
