Search for: "Stocker v. Wells"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
A good example of this is Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17; [2018] EWCA Civ 170; [2016] EWHC 474 (QB) in which the meaning of five words “he tried to strangle me” went all the way on appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
Data regulators say enforcement is working well and improving. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
The joke did not land well. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 pm
In the well known case of Stocker v Stocker, although the case failed on meaning it was accepted that publication had been proved on the basis that the message was visible to the 110 Facebook friends of the person to whom it was addressed. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm
The same court confirmed the importance of context in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17, where the fact that publication was in a Facebook post was critical, as Facebook is ‘a casual medium; it is in the nature of conversation rather than carefully chosen expression; and that it is pre-eminently one in which the reader reads and passes on’ (Lord Kerr, para. 43). [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
The court reiterated the principles as set out in Jeynes v News Magazine Ltd [2008] EWCA, Civ. 130, as affirmed in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 12:47 pm
The case is Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
13 May 2019, 11:33 am
The following passage from the UK Supreme Court’s April 2019 decision in Stocker v Stocker[2019] UKSC 17 illustrates: ‘I agree with that, particularly the observation that it is wrong to engage in elaborate analysis of a tweet; it is likewise unwise to parse a Facebook posting for its theoretically or logically deducible meaning. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court gave its judgment in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
India It is reported that Bangalore City Civil Court has granted an interim injunction against over forty media houses as well as social media platforms from publishing defamatory statements against BJP candidate and lawyer Tejasvi Surya. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 5:29 pm
» Version du 30 avril 2014 : « Certains de nos Services vous permettent d’importer, de soumettre, de stocker, d’envoyer ou de recevoir des contenus. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
The Case of Alpha Doryforiki v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
The point is well summarised in Ms Stocker’s Grounds of Appeal [pdf], at paragraph 7: The determination of meaning is often determinative of the outcome of the claim. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
The point is well summarised in Ms Stocker’s Grounds of Appeal [pdf], at paragraph 7: The determination of meaning is often determinative of the outcome of the claim. [read post]
