Search for: "Stokes v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
Paley v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2022) EWCA Civ 112 This was a second appeal to the Court of Appeal on the issue of whether Waltham Forest had taken to correct approach to assessing the affordability of an offer of a private tenancy in Stoke on Trent in discharge of their housing duty to Ms Paley and her four children (21, 15, 14 and 5). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:05 am
With Jones v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:25 pm
The case was Stokes v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Carmichael, Stokely and Charles V. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:15 pm
White Castle and Tims v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:05 am
Again, the text appears to command this perspective, stating in Article VII that the text was written at a particular designated point in historical time, September 17, 1787, and stating in Article V that subsequent amendments become operative as "Part of this Constitution" at the time "when ratified. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:15 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) F (Mongolia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 769 (25 July 2007) North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 (25 July 2007) Madan & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 770 (25 July 2007) London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 763 (25 July 2007) DS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department… [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 9:36 am
I believe these fears–stoked mainly on the right by the Eagle Forum and the John Birch Society–are overblown. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 9:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
Riley involved two decisions of the Alabama Supreme Court, Stokes v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:25 am
Congress’s enumerated powers don’t extend to making this local bar fight a federal hate crime [Ilya Shapiro on Cato brief in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:36 am
In Stokes v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
It was the case of Grant v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:35 am
It was the case of Grant v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am
A number of state legislatures have stoked the debate over abortion rights by annually passing new abortion restrictions or even partial or near-total bans, some clearly designed as vehicles for the court to reconsider Roe. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 7:58 am
State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 8:07 am
Walker v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 12:55 pm
Cites to Perkins v. [read post]
