Search for: "Stone v. Stone" Results 41 - 60 of 3,757
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
The petitioner is advised to choose a stone which falls within the Regulations”. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
McCaffrey and Birney allege covert surveillance was used against them in an attempt to reveal their source for an allegedly leaked document from the Police Ombudsman’s office, which appeared in their documentary No Stone Unturned on the 1994 UVF massacre in Loughinisland, Co Down. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:02 am by Alessandro Cerri
 The Court held, based on Stone's European Union Design Law, that the "indication of product" wording can be relied upon to resolve an ambiguity as to what is shown in the image in a design registration, and therefore assist in the interpretation of the relevant design. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Robert Post             Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who devised the funds (symbolically) supporting the volume discussed in this symposium, lived most of his life in the shadow of his rock star father, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Stone–continued to accept or at least acquiesce in most of the Court’s decisions, but after 1925 they also wrote many of their most trenchant and eventually influential dissents and concurrences. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Justice Stone, who tended to favor the writing of dissents, said that he would dissent only “with real [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:19 pm by Mark Ashton
See, Stone v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]