Search for: "Stone v. Stone" Results 81 - 100 of 2,811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2017, 2:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Recall that a jury had found Rolling Stone liable for $1 million and writer Sabrina Rubin Erdely liable for $2 million, based on what it concluded were false statements about University of Virginia Associate Dean Nicole Eramo in its “Rape on Campus” article; that award was being appealed, but the appeal has now been settled (as to both defendants). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am by Emma Cross
Jetivia SA & Anor v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors  [2015] UKSC 23 Part 2 The proper analysis of Stone & Rolls The Justices were required to consider whether the decision in Stone & Rolls [2009] UKHL 39 applied to the facts of Bilta. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:29 pm by Michael Atkins
In one hour, you’ll know everything that’s worth knowing about Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:48 am by John Diekman
Moreover, the small stone on which plaintiff allegedly fell was an unavoidable and inherent result of the work being performed at the site.Case: Ghany v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:30 am by Howard Wasserman
Because it was so late in the Term, Stone's death affected only five cases decided after April 22 (Stone became ill and died immediately after reading his dissent in Girouard v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
 on 12 March 2020, Mr David Stone, sitting as a deputy judge of [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court for the District of Maryland issued a memorandum opinion and preliminary injunction against the government in Stone, et al., v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:27 pm
Dirk Vorderstraße / CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr David Stone) Natural Instinct Ltd v Natures Menu Ltd [2020] EWHC 617 (IPEC) (20 March 2020) This was an action for trade mark infringement and passing off between two medium-sized enterprises. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 9:17 am by David Oxenford
Under the NY Times v Sullivan Supreme Court precedent, the decision in defamation cases quite often depends on the determination of whether the person who was allegedly defamed is a public figure. [read post]