Search for: "Stone v. Stone"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2017, 9:03 am
Furniture sold in Illinois through Bon-Ton Stores was the subject of a recent trademark infringement case before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Stone Creek, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:02 am
In a case that's likely to have implications on future Boston business litigation, search engine giant Google is facing down the language-learning pros at Rosetta Stone. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:29 pm
For additional background on the Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:15 am
In National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm
Geoffrey Stone is Harry Kalven, Jr., Distinguished Service Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
Pereira v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
Pereira v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:08 am
Here are the materials in Native American Arts v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:30 pm
Young 13-95 Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 2:14 pm
Maddox argued that, because Wald was deposed well in advance of trial, Stone was not deprived of the ability to prepare a proper defense.The governing principle is that the appropriate sanction for a discovery or scheduling order violation is largely discretionary with the trial court. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:58 am
By Eric Goldman Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:12 pm
I showed restraint and didn't make a '99 problems' reference in the headline. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 12:02 am
Ltd and others v G4K Fashion Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 3439 (Ch) (20 Dec2021)In Original Beauty Technology and others v G4K Fashion Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 294 (Ch) (24 Feb 2021), Mr David Stone, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, held that the defendants had infringed some of the first claimant's [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 2:35 pm
Recall that a jury had found Rolling Stone liable for $1 million and writer Sabrina Rubin Erdely liable for $2 million, based on what it concluded were false statements about University of Virginia Associate Dean Nicole Eramo in its “Rape on Campus” article; that award was being appealed, but the appeal has now been settled (as to both defendants). [read post]
16 May 2007, 12:12 pm
In the wake of Gonzales v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:26 pm
See Stone Lion Capital Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am
Jetivia SA & Anor v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors [2015] UKSC 23 Part 2 The proper analysis of Stone & Rolls The Justices were required to consider whether the decision in Stone & Rolls [2009] UKHL 39 applied to the facts of Bilta. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:48 am
Moreover, the small stone on which plaintiff allegedly fell was an unavoidable and inherent result of the work being performed at the site.Case: Ghany v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:04 am
“Piercing the corporate veil is currently a hot topic with a difference of opinion between various judges on several of the finer points, especially in a contractual context (compare Burton J in Gramsci v Stepanovs [2011] EWCH 333 Comm with Arnold J in VTB v Nutritek [2011] EWCH 3107 CH). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:10 am
In Jacquelin v. [read post]
