Search for: "Straight v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 2,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
He therefore allowed Mr Knauer to appeal straight to the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 9:50 am by Michael O'Neill
So let us get one thing straight: it is impossible to get the San Bernardino data. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am by Jon Hyman
Stated simply, the FLSA provides no avenue for the recovery of straight-time pay. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am by Jon Hyman
Stated simply, the FLSA provides no avenue for the recovery of straight-time pay. [read post]
28 May 2006, 9:19 pm by Dru Stevenson
As part of an ongoing academic project studying the almost daily reliance on commonplace dictionaries as the basis for a holding in lower court rulings, here are two more recent examples:.State v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:37 am by Markham Erickson
Finally, the state argued that the Court should revisit its holding in Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The case out of California, Marketing Information Masters v. the Board of Trustees of California State University reaches a rather predictable result in dismissing an allegation of copyright infringement on the grounds that states and state institutions are immune from lawsuits by private individuals and corporations. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 10:50 am by Rekha Arulanantham
Still the state Supreme Court was not ready for marriage equality even in 2004 when we filed suit (Castle v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:07 am by Jamison Koehler
The standard was further refined by a succession of Supreme Court cases, including United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
Yesterday the Sixth Circuit heard three straight hours of oral argument in challenges to four states’ marriage or marriage-recognition laws brought by same-sex couples. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]