Search for: "Straight v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
(Eugene Volokh) This tort — straight out of Gilbert & Sullivan — turns out to remains theoretically alive in a few states, though apparently very rarely litigated. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 7:35 pm
ResQNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:32 pm
The perils of handling an accident claim that implicates law outside of the lawyer's home state was underscored once again in the Maryland Court of Special Appeals opinion this month, in Bryan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:58 pm
So, we are going to let Haynes v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
Yesterday the Sixth Circuit heard three straight hours of oral argument in challenges to four states’ marriage or marriage-recognition laws brought by same-sex couples. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 am
Part 4: Palmore v. [read post]
10 Jun 2005, 5:37 am
In a Booker remand in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:22 pm
In Gill v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
Earlier this month, a panel of the Seventh Circuit of the United States Court of Appeal decided a relatively straight forward case by reversing the trial court’s exclusion of a forensic accountant’s damages calculation. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:40 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
District Judge John Mendez heard oral arguments in Sacramento in the federal government's suit against California over a triad of state laws. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:42 am
Recently Ramesh Ponnuru made the following argument against the Iowa Supreme Court's recent decision invalidating a 1998 statute and holding that its Equal Protection Clause forbade the state from treating gays and straights differently with respect to access to state created marriage rights. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:16 pm
As for Harris v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:29 am
An uncertain legal state of affairs would affect the economy of the nation, and therefore, it was important to settle the law swiftly and surely. [read post]
