Search for: "Straight v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2005, 5:37 am
In a Booker remand in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:42 am
Recently Ramesh Ponnuru made the following argument against the Iowa Supreme Court's recent decision invalidating a 1998 statute and holding that its Equal Protection Clause forbade the state from treating gays and straights differently with respect to access to state created marriage rights. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:22 pm
In Gill v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:29 am
An uncertain legal state of affairs would affect the economy of the nation, and therefore, it was important to settle the law swiftly and surely. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 5:01 am
Williams, 354 F.3d 497, 509 (6th Cir. 2003) (quoting Jacobsen, 466 U.S. at 114-15) (quotations omitted).The unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:16 pm
As for Harris v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:40 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
District Judge John Mendez heard oral arguments in Sacramento in the federal government's suit against California over a triad of state laws. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 11:57 am
See State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 4:47 pm
This part of Twombly is straight construction of Fed. [read post]
16 May 2007, 5:02 am
The defendant plead straight up to the indictment of 2L1.2.US v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
On Feb. 22, the Justice Department filed a merits brief (full text) in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2022, 5:25 am
The style of the opinion is, Betty Rahe v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:35 pm
On March 5, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in the Alvarado v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm
A simple approach is state provided counsel for all parties but this would impose on states costs of assistance for many who are well above typical legal aid guidelines (125% of poverty). [read post]
