Search for: "Strauss v. American Holdings, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 6:24 am
Quad Graphics, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
[See Gary Strauss, AAA Warns E15 Gasoline Could Cause Car Damage, USA TODAY, November 30, 2012.] [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
See Tanox, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Smolla and Marcy Strauss. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
"To establish a prima facie case of discrimination on the basis of race under the NYSHRL, a plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) the plaintiff is a member of a protected class, (2) the plaintiff was qualified to hold the position, (3) the plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) the adverse action occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination" (Ellison v Chartis Claims, Inc., 178 AD3d 665, 667; see Forrest v… [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
Diebold, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:10-CV-00908 (D.D.C.); SEC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
Strauss and Geoffrey R. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
HemCon, Inc. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
READ 462- 476· Peter Strauss, The Place of Agencies in Government: Separation of Powers and the Fourth Branch, 84 Colum.L.Rev. 573 (1984) READ INTRO and PART I__________Mistretta v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am
National Westminster Bank and Strauss et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
They provide a substantive foundation in classical American law, while also providing a first cut at teaching lawyer cultural skills. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Wrentham, MA; Paul Ross, President) American Pie Pizza, Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
