Search for: "Strauss v. Horton"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
See Strauss v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:41 am
But note that in Strauss v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:08 pm
The attorney general also reviewed the California Superior Court case of Strauss v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
After Proposition 8’s passage ACLU/SC represented petitioners before the California Supreme Court in Strauss v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm
He was the only Justice of the Court to dissent in Strauss v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:11 pm
" (Examiner)Related newsJustice Carlos Moreno dissented in Strauss v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
She represented San Francisco in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008) and Strauss v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm
He was lead counsel for same-sex couples in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008), and argued against the state constitutionality of Prop. 8 in Strauss v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:48 pm
Relying on Strauss v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
(That case, Strauss v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Scott Horton, A Question for December 7 (December 8, 2006)57. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Holland and others were protesting the California Supreme Court's decision in Strauss v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
It seems unlikely that such oppositions will be filed.CCF previously sought to intervene in Strauss v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Allen, Ethan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
” Raven is to be contrasted with the 2009 ruling in Strauss v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
(Newcomers to this issue might want to read this previous post first.)Let's face it -- what the Ninth Circuit's motion panel will do with the request for an emergency stay from the proponents of Proposition 8 is anybody's guess. [read post]
