Search for: "Strickland v. Day"
Results 1 - 20
of 337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am
In response, the D.A.'s Office filed a brief asserting that it had "carefully reviewed the facts and law and determined that Wharton's ineffectiveness claim fulfills the criteria articulated in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
It argued that the lower court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
After the 60-day period to file a petition for review before the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
On the day the justices voted to relist this case, the U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Two days earlier, the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Gonzalez explained that she had “probably picked it up by mistake,” and the charges were dropped, but not before the 72-year-old had spent the day in jail and her mugshot was released to the local media. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:16 pm
In Rogers v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:38 am
The Court of Appeals took up defendant’s current appeal and applied the two-prong analysis from Strickland v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am
Strickland, 531 F.3d 406, 408 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
Can fishermen be required to pay for federal monitors? And by the way – should Chevron be overruled?
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am
This week’s update will be brief because of the press of business in my day job. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 3:00 pm
Supreme Court precedent in Strickland v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm
Next up is Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]