Search for: "Strickland v. Day" Results 1 - 20 of 337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am by Paul Cassell
In response, the D.A.'s Office filed a brief asserting that it had "carefully reviewed the facts and law and determined that Wharton's ineffectiveness claim fulfills the criteria articulated in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am by Amy Howe
It argued that the lower court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
After the 60-day period to file a petition for review before the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
Gonzalez explained that she had “probably picked it up by mistake,” and the charges were dropped, but not before the 72-year-old had spent the day in jail and her mugshot was released to the local media. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:38 am by Alex Phipps
The Court of Appeals took up defendant’s current appeal and applied the two-prong analysis from Strickland v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
This week’s update will be brief because of the press of business in my day job. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am by John Elwood
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am by John Elwood
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]