Search for: "Strickland v. Lee*"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Writing for a majority of the Court, Justice O’Connor in Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 7:10 am
To discuss the case, we have Jack Park, who is Of Counsel with Strickland Brockington Lewis LLP. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:10 am
In Rodriguez-Penton v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:32 am
Per Strickland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 7:14 am
Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:58 am
Strickland v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 2:23 pm
Thus, Lee satisfied the first prong of the ineffective assistance test of Strickland v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am
Strickland v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Chatman, 13-8725, which asked whether Georgia’s Supreme Court improperly revisited the performance prong of Strickland v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
Lee, 52 M.J. 51, 53 (C.A.A.F. 1999), in light of Strickland v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:14 am
The state courts failed to correctly apply the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In last week’s post, we explored how the case of Adnan Syed serves as a powerful vehicle to teach Strickland v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
Siegel Company v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm
Siegel Company v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
RobertsonThe Tribal Struggle for Indian Sovereignty: The Story of the Cherokee Cases, by Rennard Strickland Water, Legal Rights, and Actual Consequences: The story of Winters v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 4:54 am
”) *Strickland v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:13 am
Nunez-Diaz 19-645Issues: (1) Whether the respondent, Hector Sebastion Nunez-Diaz, is categorically barred from establishing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:35 pm
In addressing the claim, the court looked at whether the State court decision involved an unreasonable application of the United States Supreme Court decision on ineffective assistance of counsel, Strickland v. [read post]