Search for: "Strickland v. Moore"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:28 pm
Moore (No. 09-658). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
Justice Ginsburg's concurrence was much more mild: To prevail under the prejudice requirement of Strickland v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 6:20 am
Judge Moore concurs in the panle opinion, but the start of her concurrence reveals that she would like to see a different result: Constrained by the rule announced in Cooey v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
But the Supreme Court pointed out that the key case of Strickland v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
First, Strickland v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:20 am
The post addressed the factual underpinnings of ineffective assistance, and didn't address whether the errors sufficed to meet the Strickland v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:41 am
The large law firm is Cravath, Swaine and Moore. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
The Court denied relief in Strickland, but then in a couple of more recent cases (Wiggins v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:44 am
Tibbets v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 2:20 pm
When faced with a claim of juror bias, Remmer v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:51 am
” Moore v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 1:22 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
Sheriff's Deputies Ruled Entitled to Qualified Immunity From Suit Over Unauthorized Search
Moore v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm
Moore & Harrington v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 1:34 am
Tiffany Brown and Agueybana Gonzalez KINGS COUNTYReal PropertySidewalk Law Obligates Property Owners to Repair Sidewalk Defect With One Half Inch Differential Moore v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Klee, No. 11-2531, a per curium unpublished decision by Judges Moore, Gibbons, and Sutton, the panel remanded the case for resolution of a Batson/Strickland claim in spite of a prior state court merits adjudication. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
Moore, 562 U. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:49 am
IN ADDITION TO THE QUESTION PRESENTED, THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO BRIEF AND ARGUE THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: DOES AEDPA DEFERENCE APPLY TO A STATE COURT’S SUMMARY DISPOSITION OF A CLAIM, INCLUDING A CLAIM UNDER Strickland v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Correll Issue: Whether the court of appeals properly applied the prejudice standard set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:38 am
Moore and State v. [read post]
