Search for: "Strickland v. Sellers"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm
Sellers 17-512 Issues: (1) Whether a court unreasonably applies Strickland v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:54 pm
Sellers involves a Georgia Supreme Court decision in a capital case on the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
TURNER, Appellants, v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
M-Edge Accessories LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
Alabama, 16-9282, concerns how a prisoner can establish that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel under the familiar standard of Strickland v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Strickland v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Cronic to cover counsel's brief absence from trial was an “extreme malfunction” entitling the petitioner to habeas relief; and (2) whether the Michigan courts reasonably determined that Donald had not shown Strickland v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm
Although the district court denied relief (concluding that Wilson could not demonstrate “prejudice” under the Supreme Court’s Strickland v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
-based internet ticket seller, Sachs was injured in a train accident in Austria. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am
Alabama, 16-9282 Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Avery Issue: Whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which affirmed the grant of a habeas petition, abrogated the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), rather than Strickland v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:09 pm
Stop was not unreasonably extended, and the trial court did not err in crediting officer’s testimony U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm
Sellers, 17-6075 Issues: (1) Whether reasonable jurists could disagree with the district c [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:05 am
Ford Motor Co., 5-Star v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
In the new case, Vasquez v. [read post]