Search for: "Strickland v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2011, 7:04 am by Michael O'Hear
The Court denied relief in Strickland, but then in a couple of more recent cases (Wiggins v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:00 pm by Mary Dwyer
§ 2254(d) and Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:05 pm by Albert Wan
 In a sort of unusual procedural backdrop, the petitioner in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:27 pm by Kiran Bhat
VacaDocket: 10-387Issue(s): (1) Whether a state court of last resort can effectively create a new category of per se prejudice for ineffective assistance of counsel by ordering a new penalty-phase trial due to counsel's failure to consider presenting mental health evidence the court admitted was as likely to have harmed defendant as to have helped him; and (2) whether a state court of last resort can disregard the admonition of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:46 am by Michael M. O'Hear
Ct. 1446, 1455 (2009) — two years after the state courts had rejected Winston’s Strickland claim. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm by Michael O'Hear
Ct. 1446, 1455 (2009) — two years after the state courts had rejected Winston’s Strickland claim. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:02 am by Ashley Russell
This Monday this Texas Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Strickland v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm by Madelaine Lane
  Accordingly, the court concluded that prejudice must be presumed under United States v Cronic, 466 US 648; 104 S Ct 2039; 80 L Ed 2d 657 (1984). [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm by David Smyth
 The SEC also presented evidence that Strickland’s superiors at GE Capital stated that contacting shareholders was not part of the normal due diligence process, and that Strickland had never done so in the past. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm by Michael O'Hear
A divided panel in Chaidez rejected both retroactivty and the Third Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
 A divided panel in Chaidez rejected both retroactivity and the Third Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in Strickland v Washington and People v Linares that a defendant in a criminal proceeding is constitutionally entitled to effective assistance of counsel. [read post]