Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2013, 7:00 pm
§ 2254(d) and Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:05 pm
In a sort of unusual procedural backdrop, the petitioner in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:27 pm
VacaDocket: 10-387Issue(s): (1) Whether a state court of last resort can effectively create a new category of per se prejudice for ineffective assistance of counsel by ordering a new penalty-phase trial due to counsel's failure to consider presenting mental health evidence the court admitted was as likely to have harmed defendant as to have helped him; and (2) whether a state court of last resort can disregard the admonition of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:46 am
Ct. 1446, 1455 (2009) — two years after the state courts had rejected Winston’s Strickland claim. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm
Ct. 1446, 1455 (2009) — two years after the state courts had rejected Winston’s Strickland claim. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:02 am
This Monday this Texas Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Strickland v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
Accordingly, the court concluded that prejudice must be presumed under United States v Cronic, 466 US 648; 104 S Ct 2039; 80 L Ed 2d 657 (1984). [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm
The SEC also presented evidence that Strickland’s superiors at GE Capital stated that contacting shareholders was not part of the normal due diligence process, and that Strickland had never done so in the past. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:30 am
And just one case, Sears v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm
A divided panel in Chaidez rejected both retroactivity and the Third Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm
A divided panel in Chaidez rejected both retroactivty and the Third Circuit’s reasoning to the contrary in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am
Strickland, 531 F.3d 406, 408 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Judith V. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
It was held in Strickland v Washington and People v Linares that a defendant in a criminal proceeding is constitutionally entitled to effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:47 am
In Wood v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
As in Missouri v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
The majority held that the error was prejudicial, and the state court’s contrary conclusion was an objectively unreasonable application of the governing case, Strickland v. [read post]
