Search for: "Strickland v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 865
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
Maryland, and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the petitioner’s attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:39 am
The petitioner argues that, because a complete breakdown in the adversarial process occurred, his claim instead is controlled by United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:30 am by John Ehrett
Massachusetts 14-1153Issue: Whether a defendant asserting ineffective assistance under Strickland v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm by John Ehrett
Kulbicki 14-848Issue: Whether an appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Kulbicki 14-848Issue: Whether an appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
It asks whether an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm by Jon Sands
United States, No. 11-99003 (Silverman with Wardlaw; partial dissent by Reinhardt)--- A divided panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a § 2255 post-conviction motion filed by a federal death-row prisoner, holding that defense counsels' guilt- and penalty-phase strategies were the product of professionally reasonable investigations under Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
The petition asks if an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am by Jon Sands
Nevertheless, the court found no Strickland prejudice at the guilt phase. [read post]