Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 864
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel will be controlled by Strickland v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
That dismissal was based on an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
That dismissal was based on an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:38 am
Donald, the underlying question is whether a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel must include a showing of prejudice under the usual rule of Strickland v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 11:46 am
Consequently, as a result, the state court’s conclusion to the contrary, in denying the 440 motion, involved an “unreasonable application” of Strickland. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:47 am
Medina v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
Also, the panel questioned prior circuit precedent holding that Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:06 am
“Establishing that a state court’s application of Strickland was unreasonable under § 2254(d) is all the more difficult. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Cronic to cover counsel's brief absence from trial was an “extreme malfunction” entitling the petitioner to habeas relief; and (2) whether the Michigan courts reasonably determined that Donald had not shown Strickland v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
On cert., the state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
Strickland v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
