Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 907
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
United States, Thomas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Kivett, and the New York state law in Cantero v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Tingley v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 9:10 am
On this note, it is very interesting to review the Texas case of Strickland v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:38 am
State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 5:56 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am
Strickland, 531 F.3d 406, 408 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 3:53 pm
Office of the United States Trustee v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:43 pm
In its analysis of the deficiency prong of the test in Strickland v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:59 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
United States, 21-8190 Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:19 pm
The case, formally known as Farias v. [read post]
Can fishermen be required to pay for federal monitors? And by the way – should Chevron be overruled?
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
The court granted vacatur under United States v. [read post]