Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated Section 2254(d)(1) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) by granting habeas relief on a purportedly unreasonable application of state law; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit violated AEDPA § 2254(d)(1) by asserting its own prejudice standard – that a defendant “must only show that he had a… [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:14 am
Under the classic Supreme Court incompetence of counsel case, Strickland v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Next up is yet another state-on-top habeas case, Howes v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:49 pm
This is a follow up to my last post, where I discussed an opinion issued by the United States Supreme Court, Missouri v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Daman v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
Bob Taft and George V. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in Missouri v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am
Latif v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:02 pm
State v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:16 pm
Even if a defendant demonstrates constitutionally deficient representation under Padilla, a petitioner must still prove prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:46 pm
United States, 655 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm
So, the question in Chaidez seems to boil down to whether Padilla announced a new rule or merely applied the basic ineffective assistance test of Strickland v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:31 am
" The case, Medlen v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:18 am
Strickland v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:57 pm
To analyze whether the ineffective assistance rises to a Sixth Amendment violation, courts must follow a two-part test set out in Strickland v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:54 am
ColsonDocket: 11-981Issue(s): Whether the prejudice arising from multiple errors committed by defense counsel should be considered cumulatively for purposes of deciding whether counsel rendered ineffective assistance under Strickland v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:03 am
State Court Judge Raymond S. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:47 am
But deficient performance is only the first prong of the test for ineffective assistance laid down in Strickland v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
