Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2008, 3:46 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:41 pm
Jones v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 11:40 am
Skakel 18-185 Issue: Whether, under the first prong of Strickland v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Washington, it actually applied the less demanding standard of United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:21 pm
The United States Supreme in 1984 handed down Strickland v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
The majority found that Abney satisfied the rigorous standards of Strickland v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in the case of Harrington v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 2:06 pm
Van Dyke v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:01 pm
The high standard of Strickland would bar relief under either analysis.U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in Missouri v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:36 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 11:16 pm
Strickland. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:49 pm
This is a follow up to my last post, where I discussed an opinion issued by the United States Supreme Court, Missouri v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:01 pm
”) Strickland v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
In the latter case, the Court has directed the parties to address a question in addition to those raised in the petition: Does AEDPA deference apply to a state court’s summary disposition of a claim including a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:37 pm
Plain Dealer Publishing Co., a state court judge (Shirley Strickland Saffold) is suing the Cleveland Plan Dealer for stating that comments posted on the newspaper’s website under the screen name “lawmiss” originated from a computer used by the judge and/or her daughter. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:51 pm
” [via FindLaw] McGuire v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:17 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v Kentucky opened the door for an argument that I have always supported-a criminal defense lawyer needs to inform a non-citizen client of the possible immigration consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]
