Search for: "Strickland v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 1:17 pm by essex county criminal lawyer
However, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v Kentucky opened the door for an argument that I have always supported-a criminal defense lawyer needs to inform a non-citizen client of the possible immigration consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
" The judge found the claims to be without merit, since the Fourth Circuit does not require unindicted co-conspirators to be named, no statement of facts is required, and the indictment stated the period of the conspiracy.Counsel erred in moving the original indictment into evidence. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:14 am by zshapiro
Under the classic Supreme Court incompetence of counsel case, Strickland v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant’s constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 12:54 pm
  In this case, the First initially remanded for a new trial (see United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:40 am by Jon Sands
Strickland, 860 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2017), and that it survives Stokeling v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:38 pm by Rory Little
Instead, the defendant must show “prejudice” under a reading of Strickland v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:27 am
Wood challenged his sentence in state post-conviction proceedings on the ground that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:39 am
The petitioner argues that, because a complete breakdown in the adversarial process occurred, his claim instead is controlled by United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:59 am by Albert Wan
True to her word, Judge Gottschall from the Northern District of Illinois has issued a follow up opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am by Albert Wan
One year later, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]