Search for: "Strong v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2021, 6:57 am
The move by the Biden Administration may not seem like a big deal, but Social Security’s wet signature requirement has made it even more difficult to apply for benefits and to obtain effective customer service. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:54 am
When people win their Social Security benefits before an administrative law judge, their lawyers can recover attorneys' fees if -- and only if -- the government's position in opposing the fees was not substantially justified. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, they were well aware of the implications the decision holds for the administrative state. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 7:30 am
Section 405(g) provides in relevant part: Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
After all, Chevron v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
For example, the administration must rescind Trump-era rules that weakened protections for beneficiaries of government-funded social services by eliminating requirements that religious providers refer individuals who ask for a secular alternative and notify individuals of their rights. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
"] An interesting opinion by the Seventh Circuit in Mitze v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
Section 405(g) provides that “[a]ny individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, … may obtain review of such decision by a civil action. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC has mandated environmental disclosure at least as far back as the Nixon Administration. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Thus, for example, ALJs within the Social Security Administration could continue to adjudicate more than half a million hearings and appeals each year. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
15 Administrability: Information asymmetries between enforcers and market participants can be especially stark in the digital economy. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can require companies to disclose information about their climate, environmental, social, and governance risks and practices. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
After West Virginia v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
WCAB panel decisions are citeable authority, particularly on issues of contemporaneous administrative construction of statutory language. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Despite SEC Commissioner Gensler’s strong statements regarding the securities status of fungible crypto tokens, the absence of any discussion of the other 16 tokens leaves the Web3 community largely in the dark as to the SEC’s approach and the rationale for treating some tokens as securities but not others. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
As FCC Commissioners, we are deeply concerned that Big Tech’s expansive position threatens free speech and is inconsistent with the nation’s communications regulatory framework. [read post]
