Search for: "Stuart Sherman" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2007, 10:57 pm
[With the Civil War ending in 1863 in this alternative history, JEB Stuart does not die at Yellow Tavern, but lives on, unlike Grant and Sherman, who die in the western theater. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:30 pm
.'" On Monday, the DC Bar hosted an event featuring Joan Biskupic, Robert Barnes, Tony Mauro, Mark Sherman, and Stuart Taylor Jr. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:31 am
Biskupic replies: "He wrote to me, Stuart. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:55 pm by Colin O'Keefe
I’ve been loving everything Stuart Carpey has been putting out lately. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 5:54 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Most of these errors,standing alone, would be of small consequence and not worth mentioning, but their cumulative impact is distressing: It is not true that byAugust 10, 1861, Union forces "had yet to achieve a victory" (p. 88); Sherman was not the senior general under Grant at Shiloh (p. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:26 pm
Finally, in the National Journal, Stuart Taylor Jr. has this column on the DC Circuit's gun control decision, which broke with Supreme Court precedent, and UCLA Law Professor Adam Winkler weighs in here at the ACS Blog. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 7:16 am
The panel consisted of Joan Biskupic of USA Today, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Tony Mauro of Legal Times and American Lawyer Media, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press and Stuart Taylor, Jr., of the National Journal and Newsweek. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:00 pm by Michael McCann
Andreas School of LawAlan Milstein – Counsel, Sherman Silverstein 4:00 p.m. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
" Stuart Benjamin weighs in here at Volokh Conspiracy on the antitrust case; at the University of Chicago Law Blog, Randy Picker has this reaction; Peter Lattman of the WSJ.com Law Blog has this post on the opinion; and ACS Blog has this post on the decision that overturns a longstanding precedent. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Sherman goes on to discuss other justices’ lack of disclosure of health information in the court’s recent history. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:12 am by Bona Law PC
Instead, there, the Court had concluded that the Sherman Act did not apply to baseball at all—because baseball was not a form of interstate commerce. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
That all patents transferred by Nokia to, or acquired by, Acacia or Conversant (or their respective subsidiaries) in violation of the Sherman Act, Clayton Act, Cal. [read post]