Search for: "Stuart v Stuart"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
” As stated by Stuart E. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:57 am
Or is this more of a Brigham City v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
The debate over this practice, often called government “jawboning,” will come to a head in Murthy v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Introduction Most undergraduates are likely to become acquainted with John Stuart Mill's famous harm principle at some point. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
This note will touch on the concepts of personal liberty in the context of abortion in the landmark case Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 6:42 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
Stuart Harrow, a longtime Defense Department employee, was furloughed in 2013 due to federal budget cuts. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm
Jones, and Stuart Kyle Duncan, reversed the District Court’s decision. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:54 pm
Department of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm
AIPPI UK is privileged to welcome Dr Stuart Baran (3 New Square) and Professor Ryan Abbott (University of Surrey) to speak in AIPPI's first rapid reaction (virtual) event of 2024. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Michaels Professor of Law UCLA School of Law Timothy Naftali Senior Research Scholar Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs Victoria Nourse Ralph V. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:35 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lady Justice King, Lord Justice Arnold and Lord Justice Stuart-Smith) Yours Naturally Naturally Yours Ltd v Kate McVier Skin Ltd and another [2023] EWCA Civ 1493 (19 Dec 2023)This was an appeal by the defendants, Kate McIver Skin Limited ("KMS") and Christopher McIver (the personal representative and widower of Kate McIver ("Mrs McIver") the founder of KMS) [read post]
