Search for: "Sturgis v. Attorney General"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2023, 9:48 am
Justice Kagan asked the attorney representing Sturgis school district what Perez should have done differently. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:42 pm
The court will first hear arguments in the cases of In re Grand Jury and Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:25 am
And Florida Star v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 9:14 am
Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
Sturgis, 199 A.D.2d 549, 606 N.Y.S.2d 241 (2nd Dept., 1993); People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:59 pm
In Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:56 pm
Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 6:25 am
He believes that those rents cannot be raised.Under the law that governs conversions, he said, a tenant in occupancy has only 90 days after the plan is accepted for filing by the attorney general to buy at the “insider price. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:27 am
This article is from Emma Sturgis, a freelance writer living in Boston. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
Robert Bork, the Solicitor-General, now acting as Attorney-General, fires Cox. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
A CVSG in an education case The justices called for the views of the U.S. solicitor general in Perez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
PA Media Lawyer reported on 3 February that the Attorney General was investigating the case, but the Guardian declined to comment. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated important state… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
