Search for: "Succession of Doll v. Doll" Results 1 - 20 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 6:21 pm by Bradley Gross
    -  Bryant left Mattel to become a consultant for MGA, and MGA turned the Bratz dolls into a billion dollar success. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Schachtman
By 1964, Hill and Doll’s causal thesis had largely prevailed. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:55 am by Robert B. Milligan and Meghan McBerry
Factual Background In early 2014, Plaintiff TFHU, a toy-inventing nonprofit, learned that defendant Mattel, a highly successful toy manufacturer, was looking to develop a new version of its “Barbie” brand doll that would include a mechanism for Barbie to fly. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:32 am
She sometimes wonders whether V's Secret was really a nascent First Amendment opinion as much as it was a statutory interpretation opinion. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:09 pm by Tom Casagrande
July 22, 2010), a Mattel employee (under an employment agreement assigning his work product to Mattel) two-timed his employer by providing a rival toy company with the idea for, and sketches and a crude sculpt of, a doll that MGA eventually transformed into the successful BRATZ line of dolls and characters. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 6:29 am
Fartman's slightly more limited repertoire included two of Fred's jokes.After the success in the district court of the claims for copyright and trade mark infringement, as well as unfair competition, the 7th Circuit affirmed: "it turns out that there is a niche market for farting dolls, and it is quite lucrative," stated Wood J. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. [read post]