Search for: "Supervisors v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 am
By Gregg Fisch and Jonathan Sokolowski Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court narrowed the definition of “supervisor” for purposes of employment-related claims. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:52 pm
On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Vance v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:53 pm
In the matter of Haybarger v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:21 am
The Supreme Court of the United States is nearing the end of its October, 2012, term, and the opinions are coming at a very high pace. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:48 am
Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998), the United States Supreme Court decided that employers are vicariously liable for severe or pervasive workplace harassment on an employee by his or her supervisor. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:06 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Vance v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In the late 90’s the United States Supreme Court ruled an employer was vicariously liable for the severe and pervasive harassment of employees by a supervisor, in violation of Title VII. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 3:14 pm
Eastus v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm
United States District Court Judge Ronald M. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
In Staub v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
Enter the United States Supreme Court in Vance v. [read post]
Supervisor's Expert Testimony Did Not Violate Confrontation Clause By Describing Peer Review Process
19 Jan 2010, 12:38 am
Massachusetts, 557 U.S. __, 129 S.Ct. 2527 (2009), in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:10 am
North Carolina The United States Supreme Court is also considering the case of Brewington v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:06 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Vance v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:07 am
On February 22, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:20 am
They filed suit in the United States District Court under federal employment law. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
Last week, the United States Supreme Court adopted a narrow definition of who is a "supervisor" under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:16 am
11-556 (decided June 24, 2013) (PDF), the United States Supreme Court decided a question left open in Burlington Industries, Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:15 am
Based on his opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
