Search for: "Supreme Party and Novelties, Inc"
Results 1 - 20 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2014, 4:33 pm
Les Laboratoires Servier & Another v Apotex Inc & Others [2014] UKSC 55 is a shorter and less formidable UK Supreme Court decision than this Kat initially feared. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am by Devlin Hartline
The novelty—and, of course, the absurdity—of Aereo’s service makes it one of the more interesting copyright puzzles. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 11:38 am by Antoinette Konski
The transcript for today’s Supreme Court oral argument in The Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:10 am by Gene Quinn
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. was decided by the Supreme Court, which appeared to disregard the warning of Diamond v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:50 pm
AdkinsHeld: In calculating attorneys' fees in breach of contract cases between private parties where the award of fees is not based on the terms of the contract, it is improper to use either the lodestar method or to calculate the attorney's fee by applying a flat percentage of the amount claimed. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2015), petition for cert. filed (No. 15-1182, Mar. 21, 2016), and in the briefs filed by various parties in relation to Sequenom Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:19 pm by Kevin F. Brady
After the parties met and conferred but failed to reach any agreement as to amounts, the Court on March 5, 2012, awarded $292,019.91 to petitioner Noam Danenberg as advancement from respondent Fitracks, Inc. in connection with his defense of claims asserted against him by Aetrex Worldwide, Inc., Fitracks’ parent, in the underlying litigation in the District of Delaware, and $276,332.13 as indemnification from Fitracks for the Court of Chancery proceeding.  [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
 The recent UK Supreme Court case Virgin Atlantic Airway Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46 (see IPKat here) concerned whether a finding of validity of a patent as between two parties was res judicata even if the patent was subsequently revoked. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
On March 2, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
  Sometimes, the Supreme Court seeks more information from the parties or someone else. [read post]