Search for: "Supreme Party and Novelties, Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
On March 2, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
On March 2, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:19 pm by Kevin F. Brady
 After the parties met and conferred but failed to reach any agreement as to amounts, the Court on March 5, 2012, awarded $292,019.91 to petitioner Noam Danenberg as advancement from respondent Fitracks, Inc. in connection with his defense of claims asserted against him by Aetrex Worldwide, Inc., Fitracks’ parent, in the underlying litigation in the District of Delaware, and $276,332.13 as indemnification from Fitracks for the Court of Chancery proceeding. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Sheppard Mullin
” As revised, the new novelty provision states: (a)  NOVELTY; PRIOR ART. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Daniel Taskalis
” As revised, the new novelty provision states: (a)  NOVELTY; PRIOR ART. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:27 am
”  As revised, the new novelty provision states: (a)  NOVELTY; PRIOR ART. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
  Prior users could rely on two novelty provisions to invalidate a claim if the prior users could show they or someone else had previously been using the invention. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
The dispute was whether the machines offered “exclusively … noncash merchandise prizes, toys, or novelties, or a representation of value redeemable for those items. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Stefanie Levine
Supreme Court Oral Argument In today's argument, three parties argued before the Justices (excluding Justice Roberts, who was recused from the case) and before a packed courtroom. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am by Stefanie Levine
Supreme Court Oral Argument In today's argument, three parties argued before the Justices (excluding Justice Roberts, who was recused from the case) and before a packed courtroom. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 5:44 pm
District Court in Austin, Texas requiring the parties in the case of Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
THE LODESTAR COMES TO ALL LONE STAR STATE COURTS Last month the Texas Supreme Court handed down an important decision on attorney’s fees in a case involving a dispute over a commercial lease. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Florian Mueller
Cir.] to provide guidance led to a wrong and dangerous ruling in WildTangent, Inc. v. [read post]