Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,057
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 11:01 pm
Maybe it is posted on top of a tall column, like in Nero's day. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Meanwhile, the field is set in the year's most competitive race for governor and Texas has gotten redder. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Meanwhile, the field is set in the year's most competitive race for governor and Texas has gotten redder. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court surprised only the most optimistic of folks and reversed the Colorado Supreme Court's decision disqualifying Donald J. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
For what it's worth, I think the Court probably reached the right result with respect to the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court, albeit not quite for the right reasons. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
" Similarly, Hamilton's 1792 financial statement included the President's salary. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm
The things that today's law professors say about today's Supreme Court are things that others could have said, and sometimes did say, about the Supreme Court for many decades. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:57 am
The Alabama Supreme Court's ruling that frozen embryos are people almost immediately led fertility clinics around the state to halt their in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment programs. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Today, people may assume that the American system never allowed such a broad conception of impeachment. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
Was the court's observation in Heller II that magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds are in common use binding on the court now? [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:27 am
Communication to the publicAs for the right of communication to the public, the Court observed that there clearly was a new communication here, given the breadth of people to whom the works could be shown online, and this required the authorisation of the works' authors or the owners of the copyright therein. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
The Supreme Court seems poised to reverse Colorado’s decision to exclude Donald Trump from its Republican presidential primary ballot on grounds other than that Trump did not take the right kind of oath to support the Constitution. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
At the time, a newspaper from Staunton, Virginia observed that Underwood's judgment was "immediately" appealed, observing that "we feel certain [it] will be reversed. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
READ MORE Nebraska Supreme Court Reviews $44K Fee for Public Records A reporter requested a keyword search of emails as part of an investigation into nitrates in the state’s drinking water from the Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
READ MORE Nebraska Supreme Court Reviews $44K Fee for Public Records A reporter requested a keyword search of emails as part of an investigation into nitrates in the state’s drinking water from the Nebraska Department of Environment and Energy. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Like many other observers, I think it’s likely the Court will hold that the questions the Colorado Supreme Court purported to answer about Donald Trump’s involvement in an insurrection and his eligibility to hold a future federal office are questions are reserved for federal decision-makers, and that the Court almost certainly won’t itself adjudicate whether Trump is eligible to be President. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
Republicans spent years packing the Supreme Court and then accused the Democrats of wanting to pack the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Then, too, he was afraid people would read his work as a commentary on the Warren Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Anderson is already beginning, before the Supreme Court’s opinion is released, because the tea leaves are clear already. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
For those people who (mistakenly) think the Roberts Court cares more about text and history than previous Supreme Courts, Trump's potential disqualification shows yet again that for the Roberts Court, values, politics, and consequences count for much more than text, history, and precedent. [read post]
