Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer" Results 61 - 80 of 3,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2007, 1:22 pm
Please observe a moment of silence for one of the most celebrated litigants in the history of the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:56 pm
Today the Supreme Court said that a 401(k) participant can sue for losses when a plan fiduciary fails to follow investment directions. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm by Roy Ginsburg
[Readers:  The following analysis of last month's Supreme Court decision in its "Cat's Paw" case was written by my colleague, Ben Weeks. [read post]
27 May 2020, 10:23 am by Gabrielle Wast
The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Oklahoma Secretary of State Michael Rogers must accept signatures collected by the Yes on 805 campaign to reform the state’s sentencing practices. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 8:32 am by Nicholas Mosvick
" In We The People: Indiana and the United States Constitution: Lectures in Observance of the Bicentennial of the Constitution (1987). [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by David Markus
  I don't get it...UPDATE -- the Supreme Court is sort of open today:When the U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While a facially-neutral limit on public gatherings might be constitutional, even if they have the effect of restricting religious observances, that's not on the table in this case. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm by Robert George
Its roots are in the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Hasan's case, the Supreme Court confirmed: "However, several factors not present in Dixon distinguish this case. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:09 am by Scott Bomboy
Finally, court observers also point to cases in Texas and Florida about social media as likely candidates to be accepted by the court. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm by Simon Lester
" On appeal, the Supreme Court affirmed this ruling, meaning that California's law does not violate the dormant Commerce Clause and the claim was rejected. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm by Simon Lester
" On appeal, the Supreme Court affirmed this ruling, meaning that California's law does not violate the dormant Commerce Clause and the claim was rejected. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 2:24 pm by Josh Blackman
" Second, Alito observes that those most familiar with the Court's work refuse to defend the Court. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 1:22 pm
Please observe a moment of silence for one of the most celebrated litigants in the history of the Supreme Court. [read post]