Search for: "Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 7:43 am by hjmarcus
United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 475, 482 (1999), superseded by statute, ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub.L. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:37 am by Kelly Schoening
United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 6:43 am
United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471, 483 (1999). [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am by Jason Shinn
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am by Jason Shinn
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:50 am by Jon Hyman
United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:07 pm
United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999), which required that the determination of whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity be balanced against the “ameliorative effects of mitigation measures,” such as medication or medical devices. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
* The test used by Woodbridge for this evaluation was discontinue as the company had concerns as to its reliability. ** In Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc., 527 US 471, the Supreme Court suggested, but did not specifically hold, that working was a major life activity *** Relying on Mathews' physician's statement, the Post did not allow Mathews to work during this period. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:01 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court’s holdings in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v Williams, the Iowa Supreme Court majority explained that it did not agree with the employee’s contention that the 2008 amendments required it to interpret the state law to include the disorder. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:31 am by Richard Hunt
United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 483, 119 S.Ct. 2139, 144 L.Ed.2d 450 (1999)). [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am by Susan Schneider
Air Force; Assistant Staff Judge Advocate, United States Air ForceRecipient of Commendation, Achievement, and Meritorious Service medals, U.S. [read post]