Search for: "Swain v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 7:48 pm by admin
On Monday, November 30, 2009, oral argument will be held in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit before Justices Raggi, McLaughlin, and Walker in the matter of In re: Grand Jury Subpoena  Account Services v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:48 pm by admin
On Monday, November 30, 2009, oral argument will be held in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit before Justices Raggi, McLaughlin, and Walker in the matter of In re: Grand Jury Subpoena  Account Services v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by David Kappos
David Kappos is a partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP and the former Director of the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Mark Litwak
The court disagreed stating that they are not substantially similar. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has held that the Americans with Disabilities Act may require the state to waive certain eligibility deadlines if waiver would reasonably accommodate a disabled person under the Act.The case is Mary Jo C. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 8:00 am
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memo by partners at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP.) [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
Carol Swain, arguing for the constitutionality of S.B. 1070, states that “[i]nstitutional failure is driving the entrance of state and local governments into an area normally dominated by the federal government.” [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am by Josh H. Escovedo
She also stated that the rings were being promoted on signs within the store as Tiffany diamond engagement rings. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 6:05 am by Gene Quinn
Kappos, a life-long employee of IBM prior to taking charge of the USPTO, is now with Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York City. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 2:57 pm
On Tuesday, May 28th, the New York State Court of Appeals heard oral arguments regarding two suits against Starbucks: Barenboim v. [read post]