Search for: "Swain v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
Carol Swain, arguing for the constitutionality of S.B. 1070, states that “[i]nstitutional failure is driving the entrance of state and local governments into an area normally dominated by the federal government.” [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am by Josh H. Escovedo
She also stated that the rings were being promoted on signs within the store as Tiffany diamond engagement rings. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 535 (21 May 2010) Re W (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 537 (20 May 2010) Groveholt Ltd v Hughes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 538 (20 May 2010) MJ (Angola) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557 (20 May 2010) Condron, R (on the application of) v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 534 (20 May 2010) Nessa v London Borough of… [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 6:05 am by Gene Quinn
Kappos, a life-long employee of IBM prior to taking charge of the USPTO, is now with Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York City. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:03 am by Duncan Hollis
United States, which will test the scope of Congress’s power to implement U.S. treaties. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 2:57 pm
On Tuesday, May 28th, the New York State Court of Appeals heard oral arguments regarding two suits against Starbucks: Barenboim v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm by Jon Sands
The superior court had dismissed his state habeas petition as "untimely and unmeritorious;" the California Court of Appeal denied his state habeas petition without comment; and the California Supreme Court denied it with "see" citations to In re Swain, 209 P.2d 793 (Cal. 1949), and People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
 art. 14.03(a)(1) (West Supp. 2015) (warrantless arrest permitted when person is found in a suspicious place under circumstances that reasonably show he is guilty of a felony); Swain v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 8:53 am by Meg Martin
Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:57 am
The petition noted that the Supreme Court had declared in 1965 (in Swain v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
How fitting for Michigan to take this major first step in aligning its practices with the requirements of the United States Constitution during this 50th anniversary year of the Gideon v Wainwright decision, which guaranteed counsel to indigent defendants facing prison time. [read post]