Search for: "Swain v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 10:45 am by Paul Rugani
On March 24, Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss an action filed by the FDIC, as receiver for two failed banks, related to RMBS certificates that the banks purchased. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm by Jon Sands
The superior court had dismissed his state habeas petition as "untimely and unmeritorious;" the California Court of Appeal denied his state habeas petition without comment; and the California Supreme Court denied it with "see" citations to In re Swain, 209 P.2d 793 (Cal. 1949), and People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:11 am by J. Alexander Lawrence
Gee, and the ABC and CBS cases proceeding in New York before the Honorable Laura Taylor Swain. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Terry Hart
Loew’s Inc v CBS, 131 F.Supp. 165 (SD Cali 1955) held that a Jack Benny parody of the film Gaslight was not fair use. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:07 am by Ron Coleman
Charbucks case (decision here, posted by Marty; the real name of the case is Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 1:23 pm by Michael Lumer
Judge Swain ultimately decided to stay matters in that litigation until at least November, based on the already pending Kerik v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by David Kappos
David Kappos is a partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP and the former Director of the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 2:52 am by Carrie Sarhangi
What is undisputedly the largest insider trading prosecution in American history, the United States of America v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 8:18 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: SHELLEY MOORE v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
How fitting for Michigan to take this major first step in aligning its practices with the requirements of the United States Constitution during this 50th anniversary year of the Gideon v Wainwright decision, which guaranteed counsel to indigent defendants facing prison time. [read post]