Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney" Results 201 - 220 of 439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Michael Adebolajo, one of two men convicted of murdering a soldier in May last year, was given a whole life tariff after Mr Justice Sweeney found that he had no prospect of rehabilitation. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:11 pm by Dwight Sullivan
s terminal element must be alleged on charge sheet), Sweeney (application of Melendez-Diaz), and Baker (identification evidence). [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
At the same time, however, “allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions as well as factual claims flatly contradicted by documentary evidence are not entitled to any such consideration” (Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11; Sweeney v Sweeney, 71 AD3d 989, 991). [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:26 am
Sweeney (the "Lawyers"), alleging legal malpractice that resulted in adverse tax consequences. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:59 am by Dwight Sullivan
On Wednesday, NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:48 am by Giles Peaker
The leading authority at the time was Mitchell v News Group [2013] EWCA Civ 1537 (our note here). [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
Sweeney was also the attorney in the other aggravated murder case the court reversed last week on manifest weight grounds, State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Associated Newspapers Ltd, R (on the application of) v Rt Hon Lord Justice Leveson [2012] EWHC 57 – Read judgment On Friday 20 January 2012 the Administrative Court dismissed the second application for judicial review of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 "A waiver of the attorney-client privilege may be found where the client places the subject matter of the privileged communication in issue or where invasion of the privilege is required to determine the validity of the client's claim or defense and application of the privilege would deprive the adversary of vital information (see Hurrell-Harring v State of New York, 75 AD3d 667, 668; 601 Realty Corp. v Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P.C., 74 AD3d 1179, 1179;… [read post]