Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney" Results 221 - 240 of 443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2014, 12:14 pm by emagraken
Reasons for judgement were released today (Schroeder v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:10 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petitions of the day are: Sweeney v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Land Use Opinions;Environmental Law Opinions Body: AC34756 - Bochanis v. [read post]
Michael Adebolajo, one of two men convicted of murdering a soldier in May last year, was given a whole life tariff after Mr Justice Sweeney found that he had no prospect of rehabilitation. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:35 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Tessa recently highlighted the case of Masih v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:32 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Tyler Court of Appeals addressed this issue in a 2007 opinion styled, Canal Insurance v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 3:08 pm by Workplace Prof
Thanks to Laura Cooper (Minnesota) for sending along a note about Sweeney v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 11:20 am
“Our locally elected trustees are responsible for determining board policy and we will forward the information contained in the order to them for their review and consideration,” says District School Board of Niagara spokesman Brett Sweeney. [read post]
29 May 2013, 3:18 am
Sweeney, Transitional Criminal Justice at the ECtHR: Implications for the Universality of Human Rights Christina M. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
That said, of the 1,130 participants whose profiles Sweeney reviewed, only 579 had provided their full zip code, date of birth, and gender in the relevant fields. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The handbook was prepared by the Office of Chief Counsel for the Criminal Tax Division and obtained through the Freedom of Information Act....The IRS continued to take the same position, the documents indicate, even after a federal appeals court ruled in the 2010 case U.S. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Archbold 4-447 (f) suggests that where asked a judge should offer an explanation: “a reasonable doubt is the sort of doubt that might affect the mind of the of a person in dealing with matters of importance in his own affairs” Walters v R. [read post]