Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney"
Results 221 - 240
of 435
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Sweeney-Cunningham v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:32 am
The Tyler Court of Appeals addressed this issue in a 2007 opinion styled, Canal Insurance v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:28 am
Sweeney, and J. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:47 am
Sweeney v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 3:08 pm
Thanks to Laura Cooper (Minnesota) for sending along a note about Sweeney v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 8:21 am
Sweeney, and J. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 11:20 am
“Our locally elected trustees are responsible for determining board policy and we will forward the information contained in the order to them for their review and consideration,” says District School Board of Niagara spokesman Brett Sweeney. [read post]
29 May 2013, 3:18 am
Sweeney, Transitional Criminal Justice at the ECtHR: Implications for the Universality of Human Rights Christina M. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm
That said, of the 1,130 participants whose profiles Sweeney reviewed, only 579 had provided their full zip code, date of birth, and gender in the relevant fields. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
The handbook was prepared by the Office of Chief Counsel for the Criminal Tax Division and obtained through the Freedom of Information Act....The IRS continued to take the same position, the documents indicate, even after a federal appeals court ruled in the 2010 case U.S. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:45 am
Sweeney and State Farm. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Archbold 4-447 (f) suggests that where asked a judge should offer an explanation: “a reasonable doubt is the sort of doubt that might affect the mind of the of a person in dealing with matters of importance in his own affairs” Walters v R. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:11 pm
Sweeney and State Farm Mut. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
Hunter next discussed the Board’s recent invitation for input on whether university faculty members are employees covered under the NLRA or are managerial employees excluded from coverage, as was established by the case NLRB v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm
Sweeney, et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:56 am
In Friday’s opinion of Anchor Pipe Company, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:15 pm
Sweeney, 70 M.J. 296 (C.A.A.F. 2011), which was announced on the penultimate day of last term, and United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:33 pm
In September 2011, Judge Stucky dissented from 5 summary disposition remands of Sweeney trailers, adhering to his Sweeney dissent in 4 of them and finding waiver in the fifth. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:45 am
” Sweeney, of course, was another skirmish in the war on drugs, and so was State v. [read post]
