Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney" Results 241 - 260 of 395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm by Phil Cave
NMCCA had previously reversed on a Blazier-Sweeney basis in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On Friday 13 January 2012 the Administrative Court (Toulson LJ, Sweeney and Sharp JJ) heard a remarkable application in the case of R (on the application of Associated Newspapers) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
Both aspects of the claim were rejected by Sweeney J at first instance, and it was only the human rights question that was considered on appeal. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:31 am
 Meanwhile Deborah Sweeney (CEO of MyCorporation.com), writing for IP Finance, takes a rosy view of the American Invents Act for small businesses which, this Kat suspects, will not be shared by all that blog's US readers. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
Sweeney was also the attorney in the other aggravated murder case the court reversed last week on manifest weight grounds, State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:09 pm by Viking
STUCKY, Judge (concurring in the result): I affirm my dissenting vote in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Similarly, there is no express or implied contract that would give rise to a cause of action for indemnification (see County of Westchester v Welton Becket Assoc., 102 AD2d 34, 42, affd 66 NY2d 642; Jakobleff v Cerrato, Sweeney & Cohn, 97 AD2d 786). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:58 am by Matt Brown
He got that from the part in Sweeney discussing State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:07 am by lpbncontracts
Schooner and the Government Contracts at GW Law Facebook page, we have word of this juicy decision by Judge Sweeney of the Court of Federal Claims in Systems Applications and Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 12:15 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Next week at the CCAs:  On Thursday, ACCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]