Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney"
Results 261 - 280
of 441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2012, 8:55 am
Sweeney, 70 M.J. 296 (C.A.A.F. 2011), resolve the medical examiner surrogate issue? [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm
Associated Newspapers Ltd, R (on the application of) v Rt Hon Lord Justice Leveson [2012] EWHC 57 – Read judgment On Friday 20 January 2012 the Administrative Court dismissed the second application for judicial review of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 3:13 am
Lord Justice Toulson (with whom Sweeney and Sharp JJ agreed) summarised the effect of the Chairman’s rulings on anonymity as follows: “He has made a positive decision in principle to receive anonymous evidence from journalists who wish to conceal their identity because of fear of career blight, but that is a general ruling. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:40 am
"A waiver of the attorney-client privilege may be found where the client places the subject matter of the privileged communication in issue or where invasion of the privilege is required to determine the validity of the client's claim or defense and application of the privilege would deprive the adversary of vital information (see Hurrell-Harring v State of New York, 75 AD3d 667, 668; 601 Realty Corp. v Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P.C., 74 AD3d 1179, 1179;… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm
NMCCA had previously reversed on a Blazier-Sweeney basis in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
(c) Sweeney J, Eady J, Mann J and Vos J? [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
In the Courts On Friday 13 January 2012 the Administrative Court (Toulson LJ, Sweeney and Sharp JJ) heard a remarkable application in the case of R (on the application of Associated Newspapers) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
Both aspects of the claim were rejected by Sweeney J at first instance, and it was only the human rights question that was considered on appeal. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:42 am
Sweeney, 70 M.J. 296 (C.A.A.F. 2011). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm
Sweeney [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:31 am
Meanwhile Deborah Sweeney (CEO of MyCorporation.com), writing for IP Finance, takes a rosy view of the American Invents Act for small businesses which, this Kat suspects, will not be shared by all that blog's US readers. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
Sweeney was also the attorney in the other aggravated murder case the court reversed last week on manifest weight grounds, State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 6:09 pm
STUCKY, Judge (concurring in the result): I affirm my dissenting vote in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:19 pm
Sweeney, 70 M.J. 296 (C.A.A.F. 2011). [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 6:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:52 am
Sweeney, 227 P.3d 868, 872 (Ariz.App. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
Similarly, there is no express or implied contract that would give rise to a cause of action for indemnification (see County of Westchester v Welton Becket Assoc., 102 AD2d 34, 42, affd 66 NY2d 642; Jakobleff v Cerrato, Sweeney & Cohn, 97 AD2d 786). [read post]
