Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney" Results 321 - 340 of 439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2009, 3:50 am
The result in State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
Sweeney, 813 F.2d 907, 909 (8th Cir.1987) (general search limited only by broad tax evasion statute held overly broad, where probable cause existed only to search for evidence of tax evasion in connection with one particular project); United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
Similarly, Sweeney found in her project that student contributions to Wikipedia “[were] successful in getting students to answer their own questions . . . [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On Friday 13 January 2012 the Administrative Court (Toulson LJ, Sweeney and Sharp JJ) heard a remarkable application in the case of R (on the application of Associated Newspapers) v Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:49 am by Florian Mueller
When Epic CEO Tim Sweeney declared war on Apple by way of a 2 AM email, he announced that the two companies would be in conflict "on a multitude of fronts – creative, technical, business, and legal" (and possibly "for many years"). [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 10:29 pm by Florian Mueller
They don't make the decision, but both the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) presiding over the investigation and, ultimately, the Commission (the U.S. trade agency's top-level decision-making body) often find the staff's input useful.Discovery disputes between private parties are normal--and it's equally normal that companies being investigated or sued by antitrust enforcers dispute the scope of discovery requests (I've been watching that for a while now in United States… [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The handbook was prepared by the Office of Chief Counsel for the Criminal Tax Division and obtained through the Freedom of Information Act....The IRS continued to take the same position, the documents indicate, even after a federal appeals court ruled in the 2010 case U.S. v. [read post]